Nội dung text NEG CASE OZMS IL
Ozone Park LS negate the resolution: Resolved: “the United Kingdom should rejoin the European Union.” Our sole argument is POISONING PROGRESS. The UK is striking a Goldilocks approach in its relations with the European Union. Their current trade deal has enabled economic prosperity along with regulatory flexibility. Picheta detailed in May [Rob Picheta (Enterprise Writer for CNN), Anna Cooban & James Frater, 05-19-2025, “Europe and the UK ‘reset’ relations, almost a decade after Brexit nearly broke them”, CNN, https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/19/europe/britain-eu-summit-deal-gbr-intl, accessed 09-21-25] wrong The United Kingdom and the European Union have agreed to a landmark deal aimed at “resetting” their post-Brexit relationship, easing restrictions on travel and work for hundreds of millions of people on the continent. The pact, agreed at a summit in London on Monday, followed months of negotiations between Downing Street and Brussels. It includes agreements on defense, migration, work and travel — and leaders on each side of the Channel will hope it leaves behind years’ worth of tensions. “This is a historic moment,” EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as they unveiled the deal on Monday. “We’re turning a page. We’re opening a new chapterin our unique relationship.” “Britain is back on the world stage,” Starmer added following the meetings at Lancaster House. But the deal has already threatened to open old wounds; Starmer has been criticized by leaders on Britain’s resurgent populist right, who have claimed the deal weakens the UK’s sovereignty. Here’s what you need to know. Slashing ‘red tape’ for trade The two sides have struck a deal to ease trade between their two markets — one of the most contentious areas of the long-running Brexit negotiations. Downing Street announced in a statement that it has agreed to reduce the “red tape” currently burdening British businesses exporting food and drink to the bloc on an indefinite basis. Part of that agreement will include the complete removal of some routine checks on animal and plant products, it said. Starmer’s office added that it hoped the changes would ultimately “lower food prices and increase choice on supermarket shelves” but was resolute that they do not cross certain “red lines” central to the government’s vision of Brexit, including remaining outside of the EU’s single market and customs union. The trade partners have decided to move toward “a common sanitary and phytosanitary area,” von der Leyen told reporters on Monday. “That means more certainty, more stability for farmers and food producers, and fishermen and fisherwoman, on both sides of the Channel.” In any case, changes to the trading rules between the two sides are significant: The EU is the UK’s largest trading partner, with the bloc accounting for 41% of Britain’s exports and more than half of its imports last year, according to official figures covering both goods and services. The UK is also a top trading partner for Brussels, and was the second-largest destination for EU goods exports in 2024, Eurostat data shows. The deal also included commitments to give the EU fishing boats access to British waters for a further 12 years beyond the current agreement, which is set to expire next year. Europe will also open up its electricity market to the UK, a move that von der Leyen praised as a step toward boostingenergy security and lowering prices. The agreement comes as US President Donald Trump’s barrage of tariffs have wreaked havoc on the global trading order. In a joint statement released Monday,the EU and UK said they shared a “commitment to free, sustainable, fair and open trade.” A new defense pact The two sides have worked increasingly closely on defense since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and that unity has only grown since the Trump administration threatened to pull its security guarantees for Europe and leave Kyiv to fend for itself against Moscow. It made defense one of the least controversial aspects of the negotiations, and Monday’s deal saw a formal handshake on a new UK-EU defense partnership. The UK now will gain access to a Europe-wide defense program, allowing British companies to bid for security contracts alongside European rivals. “This joint procurement will increase our readiness, will close military gaps that we have,” von der Leyen said. Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have emerged as the leading voices advocating for Kyiv on the global stage, and the two leaders have pushed their European counterparts to boost military spending and join a European bulwark against Moscow’s advances. Starmer, along with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of France, Germany and Poland, spoke to US President Donald Trump at a European summit in Albania last Friday. Starmer, along with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of France, Germany and Poland, spoke to US President Donald Trump at a European summit in Albania last Friday. Steffen Kugler/Bundesregierung/Reuters What will change for Brits and Europeans? The two sides will work toward a youth mobility scheme that will allow under-30s to travel and work between the UK and Europe. Starmer has taken pains to insist there is no return to full freedom of movement, a benefit
registration system. HM Treasury's draft digital asset legislation introduces a clear framework for cryptoassets, bringing activities like trading platforms, custody, staking, and stablecoin issuance under the UK regulatory perimeter. Stablecoin issuers will be required to meet rigorous standards for reserves, liquidity, and reporting. The new rules aim to ensure the stability of these assets, improving trust and consumer protection. This helped their economy to flourish. Carkett detailed in 2021 [Martin Carkett, PhD in Stem Cell and Developmental Biology at the Francis Crick Institute and University College London, 8-11-2021, What’s Driving Britain’s Tech Growth Three questions to Martin Carkett, Montaigne Institute, https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/whats-driving-britains-tech-growth#:~:text=The%20 British%20tech%20sector%20has,to%20build%20its%20digital%20economy, Willie T.] The tech industry is expanding more than two and half times faster than the rest of the British economy, with a reported 2.1 million jobs created in the digital economy in 2018. The UK digital sector is said to have added £149bn or £400m a day into the country’s economy in 2018, an increase of 7.9% from the year before. When and why did the UK chose to make tech its priority? Britain, a nation of shopkeepers, has always had an entrepreneurial spirit at its heart and has consequently had a long love affair with tech. In its broadest terms, technology, science and innovation have been core priorities for Britain for centuries, but it's only in the last decade that Britain’s digital tech sector has really come to the fore. As far back as the 1600s, English statesman and philosopher Sir Francis Bacon made the first pioneering steps in developing the scientific method, revolutionizing our approach to discovery and innovation. In the centuries that followed, Britain’s high wage economy, yearning to do things better and faster, and to access cheap energy and capital, precipitated the conditions that ensured that the industrial revolution first took seed in Britain. The country's subsequent investment in innovation and technology transformed its industries from hand production methods to mechanical manufacturing ones, greatly improving productivity and propelling Britain to prosperity. In more modern times, the UK has continued to prioritize technology. From Harold Wilson’s focus on embracing the "white heat of technology" in the 1960s, to Tim Bernard Lee's development of the World Wide Web at the end of the last century, Britain has invested heavily in science and tech, and has maintained a role of global leadership in these fields. The British tech sector has grown 10-fold in the last decade. Venture capital investment [...] has risen from £1.2bn in 2010 to £11.3bn in 2020. But it is over the last two decades that the UK has built upon this legacy and extended this ethos to its digital tech sector to build its digital economy. Governments and business alike have recognized the digital tech sector’s increasing strategic importance for the UK economy. Fostering its development has consequently been a key feature of industrial strategies. And it’s working. The British tech sector has grown 10-fold in the last decade. Venture capital (VC) investment into this sector has risen from £1.2bn in 2010 to £11.3bn in 2020. And it continues to grow at a fast pace with tech companies raising more money between January and June 2021, than they did during the whole of 2020, equivalent to $18bn.This is more than twice what Germany ($8.7bn) or France ($5.3bn) attracted. London now ranks fourth behind the Bay Area, Beijing and New York in terms of the number of start-ups and unicorns created. Since 2010, the number of British unicorns has grown from 8 to 91, while the number of companies nearing unicorn status has also grown 10-fold. And why has the British government chosen tech as a priority? Just as Britain invested in the industrial manufacturing technologies of the past, digital technologies of today offer simpler, more efficient and more effective means of producing value. In short,technology and innovation are the critical pathways to economic growth and prosperity, offering a better quality of life for UK citizens. But in many ways, it is the tech industry that has chosen the UK, rather than the other way round. The UK’s trusted institutions and legal frameworks, its strong economic fundamentals, its access to global capital markets, and its open and creative culture have created an ecosystem ripe for tech development. In return, people across Britain have benefited immensely. Singham found this year [Shanker Singham (one of the world's leading international trade experts), 01-16-2025, “What should the government seek from the EU reset?”, UK in a Changing Europe, https://ukandeu.ac.uk/what-should-the-government-seek-from-the-eu-reset/, accessed 09-21-25] wrong Why does this matter? If the system the UK was being pushed to align with was a fundamentally pro-competitive one that unleashed economic growth, then the cost of divergence would far outweigh any harm. However, ifthe EU system is actually anti-competitive, leading to wealth destruction, then that harm far outweighs the divergence cost. The German economy has