Tiêu đề [GV] ĐỀ 16 - A. ĐỀ THI.docx ✅

4 C. many of which, having sprawled beyond their zoning, quietly ossify into informal economies D. many of which having been sprawl beyond its zonings, quietly ossify into informal economy Question 19. A. disbursements that, if they had arrived sooner, stabilizes water, sanitation, and shelter pipelines B. disbursements which will, were they to arrive sooner, stabilized water, sanitation, and shelter pipelines C. disbursements that would, had they arrived sooner, have stabilized water, sanitation, and shelter pipelines D. disbursements which, arriving sooner, would stabilizing water, sanitation, and shelter pipeline Question 20. A. whose mandate, though municipal rather than federal, are stretched across migration’s entire lifecycle B. whose mandates, though municipal rather than federal, are stretched across migration’s entire lifecycle C. who mandates, though municipal rather than federal, is stretched across migration’s entire lifecycle D. which mandates, though municipal rather than federal, are stretching across migration’s entire lifecycle Question 21. A. only then will ministries budget for tenyear horizons rather than oneoff surges B. only then ministries will budget for tenyear horizons rather than oneoff surges C. not until will ministries budget for tenyear horizons rather than oneoff surges D. not unless ministries would budget for tenyear horizons rather than oneoff surges Question 22. A. were regional compacts to negotiate earlier, border towns had not become triage sites indefinitely B. if regional compacts negotiate earlier, border towns would not have become triage sites indefinitely C. had regional compacts been negotiated earlier, border towns might not have become triage sites indefinitely D. unless regional compacts had negotiated earlier, border towns would not become triage sites indefinitely Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 23 to 30. In cities where statues are draped rather than toppled, remembrance is practiced through hesitation. Plaques acquire footnotes, tour guides rehearse competing chronologies, and schoolchildren learn that the absence of a monument can itself be a monument. When proposals for new memorials stall, archives become pilgrimage sites – reading rooms stand in for plazas – while former plinths gather candles and cardboard manifestos. The politics of caution, though derided as paralysis, often signals an ethical refusal to let one narrative calcify at the expense of others. Curators and urbanists increasingly speak of “nonuments”: sites whose power derives from what no longer stands. The category is capacious – the rejected, the removed, the ruined, the rebuilt, the repurposed – and resists singular readings. Because memory is a choreography between objects and their publics, no monument, however didactic, can dictate a single past. In Paris, the Bastille’s vanished masonry, the Panthéon’s secular liturgy, and the Fourth Plinth’s revolving commissions illustrate how absence, ritual, and experiment braid into a living syllabus of history. For critics, the danger is nostalgia masquerading as neutrality. Efforts to “restore” often smuggle yesterday’s hierarchies into tomorrow’s plazas; conversely, total erasure can launder responsibility by deleting the evidence of harm. A more demanding civic pedagogy reframes sites rather than sanitizes them, insisting that damaged statues, empty sockets, or reprogrammed