Title WRITING 4 - OPINION ESSAY [2].docx ✅

WRITING 4 - OPINION ESSAY [2] Recording: COUNTERARGUMENT IN TASK 2 “When writing informational and argumentative pieces, you can ask yourself: What points might a critical reader raise against me? What objections might they have? Pre-empt those objections. If your writing addresses the reader's question at the exact point when it occurs to them, then you're doing really well.” (Advice from IDP & British Council)

Opponents of retaining physical schools often emphasize that the amount of information the internet provides for children far exceeds/ surpasses that in any textbook. They say, with this reservoir of knowledge, children can easily self- study at home and no longer need to attend school. However, this perspective overlooks the fact that not all information on the internet is reliable, and that unauthenticated information is rampant across platforms. For young, impressionable minds, frequent exposure to fake news and/or toxic perspectives can distort / skew their worldview. This is why we still need schools, which employ certified teachers to curate, interpret, and deliver knowledge, forming a solid foundation upon which pupils can erect their understanding. It must also be recognized that schools are not just a vehicle for transferring academic knowledge but also a mini-society in which children can develop socially. Daily interactions with peers and teachers can help children learn how to communicate, interact, and behave in different social settings. If schools disappeared, these opportunities would be limited, and this could likely take a toll on children’s social development. This can be seen in the COVID-19 lockdown period, when children had to study remotely, and after returning to school, many of them were reported to experience awkwardness in a face-to- face setting. This example is a testament to the importance of schools in developing children’s social skills.
HW W1: In the past, important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums. However, today, people can see everything on the internet without paying any money. Therefore, we no longer need museums. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?  = The internet will replace physical museums VER 1 - BC (9999) Many years ago, it seemed that the only way for people to learn about history and culture was to attend museums. This is no longer the case today, as advances in technology have allowed people to do so freely via the internet, which is why some people believe there is no point in retaining physical museums. I also hold this view, albeit with some reservations. Perhaps the foremost argument against keeping traditional museums lies in the costs associated with their upkeep. Governments are having to allocate millions of dollars to the operation and maintenance of public museums every year. This can take a toll on government coffers, especially those of developing and impoverished countries, which are already stretched thin. Of course, one might propose privatizing museums to alleviate this financial burden. However, with declining attendance rates and dwindling popularity, it is questionable whether private entities would be willing to assume responsibility for these potentially unprofitable ventures. A more cost-efficient solution here might be removing physical museums in favor of virtual displays. Granted, proponents of keeping museums often highlight their role as major tourist attractions, citing examples like The British Museum, the Louvre,