Content text Dynamic charts.docx
Writing - Dynamic charts full IELTS Writing: 2 phần => 60p làm bài + Miêu tả dữ liệu: con số (biểu đồ) & hình ảnh (bản đồ & quy trình) + Nghị luận xã hội: quan điểm cá nhân & nhân tố khách quan của xu hướng xã hội Biểu điểm: tiêu chí chấm điểm + TA (TR): Giải quyết yêu cầu đề bài - Task 1: Overview (tóm tắt chung) => 4 đoạn: Opening - Overview - 2 Bodies => key features: a. Xu hướng (trends): tăng, giảm, dao động, duy trì (stability) b. Thứ tự (order): lớn nhất, nhỏ nhất c. Sự thay đổi (growth rate): tăng/ giảm nhiều nhất d. Sự khác biệt (differences) e. Sự tương đồng (similarities) (8+) Body: Report data (accuracy) & Comparison + CC (coherence & cohesion): - Coherence: grouping subjects & paragraphing - Cohesion: transition (linking device) + LR (lexical resource): - Range: + paraphrase => đối tượng nghiên cứu & cách miêu tả + usage of less common words (C1 & C2) - Precision: collocation & context => READ + GRA (grammatical range & accuracy) - Range: Full usage of 4 sentence types Fundamental features of making sentences: S V O C V ~ changeable => tenses/ grammatical features S/O/C ~ fixed => sth: noun phrase, Ving, that + SV, tđh + SV, S Ving O + Simple sentence: SVOC + Compound sentence (ghép): SVOC, [liên từ: fanboys] SVOC => for/ and/ nor/ but/ or/ yet/ so + Complex sentence (phức): [liên từ] SVOC (TĐ) SVOC (KQ) => while/ because (as)/ although/ if + Compound-complex sentence: SVOC [liên từ ghép] SVOC [liên từ phức] SVOC (TĐ) - Precision: error-free sentences —-------------------------- SỐ: Dynamic/ Static numeric data —-------------------------- Loại biểu đồ: đường (line graph), cột (bar chart), bảng (table), tròn (pie chart) a. Dynamic charts: có thời gian (time-based) - ít nhất là 2 mốc thời gian => TREND I. Opening: Paraphrase đề bài VD: The bar chart shows the percentage (proportion) of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010. => (8+) The bar chart illustrates/ compares the university attendance rates in four countries in three years 2000, 2005 and 2010.
(7+) The bar chart illustrates the share of young undergraduates/ youngsters in college in four countries in 2000, 2005 and 2010. II. Overview (tóm tắt chung) => Không nói đến số liệu Dynamic: major key features => trends & order (growth rate) - Transition: “Looking at the chart, it is clear that …” - Trends “while the share of college young students in countries A and D increased, a stable progression was recorded in countries B and D” + Cách 1: dùng động từ => tăng: increase, rise < soar/ surge (C1) => giảm: decrease, decline < plummet/ drop/ nosedive (C1) *adv (-ly): significantly/ dramatically - gradually/ steadily - mildly/ slightly => dao động: fluctuate => ổn định: remain unchanged/ stable + Cách 2: dùng danh từ => S + Verb + noun: witness/ undergo/ record => sự tăng: an upward trend (tendency/ pattern) / an increase/ a rise => sự giảm: a downward trend (progression/ paradigm) /a decline/ a decrease + Cách 3: dùng bị động => noun + be + V3 + in S + Cách 4: dùng thời gian làm chủ ngữ => time + verb + noun + in S - Order: highest/ lowest levels (figures) [transition: In addition/ Another key feature is that] => Country D registered the highest figures [out of (among) the countries examined]. => Looking at the chart, it is clear that while the share of college young students in countries A and D increased, a stable progression was recorded in countries B and D. In addition, country D registered the highest figures out of the countries examined. III. Body: Mốc chính: initial data - peak - bottom - final level —-------------- At the outset of the survey, the proportion of youth university schoolers in country A was approximately 38%, which then rose to the neighborhood of 58% in 2014. Similarly, an upward progression was seen in country D’s level of college participation among its young people, surging by 20% to 80% throughout the period. The aforementioned upswing was not seen in countries B and C; instead, these two countries showed patterns of stability in their figures. Specifically, the former’s figures hovered around 40%, and the latter’s clustered between 50%.
The table illustrates registration data on five means of transport in Australia in three years 2010, 2012 and 2014. As can be inferred from the table, an upward tendency was seen in the registration of the types of travel examined, with the most significant growth being recorded in the number of motorbikes licensed. In addition, passenger vehicles registered the highest figures out of the surveyed transportations, and the reverse was true for light trucks. Initially, 11.8 million public transports were licensed in Australia, which then increased by 10.2% to 13 million in 2014, still being highest among the types of vehicle examined. In comparison, the most significant growth was seen in motorcycles, an increase of 30.8% from 0.54 million to 0.709 million throughout the period. By contrast, registered heavy trucks rose the least in number, a 8.3% rise from 0.384 to 0.416 million vehicles. As for the two remaining types of transport surveyed, increases of 17.4% and 23.5% were respectively reflected in the number of licensed commercial vehicles and light trucks.