Title Raising fattening food prices ✅

Fanpage: Write with Travis https:/ bit.ly/4hl5dOp Question: More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think that the government should increase the price of fattening foods to address this issue. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? VER 2023 (Actual answer - BC - TR: 8 / CC: 9 / LR: 9 / GRA: 9) In light of the increasing obesity rate, there have been calls for levying higher prices on fattening foods. In this essay, however, I will challenge this proposal. Granted, proponents of raising fattening food prices might argue that it could discourage regular consumption of food of this kind, while simultaneously incentivizing the shift towards healthier alternatives like wholesome food. The implication of this would be a reduced number of individuals having overweight problems. However, this perspective overlooks the busy nature of the modern world that makes such fattening foods as fast food an unavoidable option, especially for those with hectic schedules. This means even if this kind of food were made more expensive, many people would still choose it for its convenience. That being the case, the problem of obesity would remain unsolved. The argument against increasing the cost of fattening foods is further fortified by the social problems it could cause. In fact, such foods as fast food are cheaper compared to healthy ones and thus more suitable for middle- and low-income earners. Therefore, raising the prices of fattening foods alone could give rise to more financial burdens on this group of people, and might further exacerbate the problem of social inequalities on a grander scale. Rather than interfering with fattening food prices, the government should turn to other measures to tackle the problem of obesity. One such approach would
Fanpage: Write with Travis https:/ bit.ly/4hl5dOp be raising public awareness of the dire health repercussions attached to excessively consuming fattening foods. People, once fully cognizant of these consequences, would be more cautious about their food choices, thereby becoming less vulnerable to obesity. Such a measure should be executed in tandem with providing more subsidies for healthy foods to make them more financially accessible for the general public. This could encourage people to have healthy diets, without having to worry about the price tag of healthy foods. In conclusion, for the reasons elaborated above, I would doubt the efficacy of adjusting fattening food prices upward in countering the problem of overweight in the general population. Instead of hiking up fattening food prices, the government should ramp up its efforts to educate the public and promote the inclusivity of healthy foods. By doing so, the number of those having overweight problems could be curbed.

Fanpage: Write with Travis https:/ bit.ly/4hl5dOp but also from increasingly sedentary habits. Governments should launch nationwide initiatives to promote physical activity, such as expanding public exercise facilities, integrating fitness programs into school curriculums, and running educational campaigns on the long-term consequences of inactivity. Encouraging people to incorporate movement into their daily routines, whether through cycling infrastructure, workplace wellness programs, or community sports events, could significantly curb obesity rates. In conclusion, whilst levying higher prices on fattening foods is a step in the right direction, it is insufficient on its own. For a comprehensive and sustainable approach to tackling obesity, this policy must be accompanied by subsidies for healthier foods and nationwide efforts to promote active lifestyles. Only through this multifaceted strategy can governments effectively reduce or even reverse the rising trend of obesity.