Title Linear Samples - Agree-Disagree ✅

DOL English Agree/Disagree SAMPLE 1 1. The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Full essay: Some people believe raising the punishments for traffic offenses is the ideal approach to reduce the number of accidents occurring. While I acknowledge that stricter penalties might be one straightforward solution, I strongly disagree that they are the only viable option, since other measures, such as installing traffic cameras and investing in driving awareness, would also be beneficial. Punishment: Idea: A => E Hypothesis: not A => ... => E (-) Effect: A’ => ... => E’ Link: A => E Idea: Putting harsher punishments on irresponsible drivers => might potentially minimize traffic accidents and promote safe driving Hypothesis: lenient penalties => are the primary reason why the majority of people deem texting while driving - a dangerous practice - has no repercussions, causing this reckless behavior to grow more prevalent in developed nations Effect: individuals would rethink their actions => if the legislation significantly increased the fines Link: severe punishment => is frequently an effective and straightforward means of regulating the conduct of drivers on the road Putting harsher punishments on irresponsible drivers might potentially minimize traffic accidents and promote safe driving. Obviously, lenient penalties are the primary reason why the majority of people deem texting while driving - a dangerous practice - has no repercussions, causing this reckless behavior to grow more prevalent in developed nations such as the United States and the United Kingdom. Therefore, individuals would rethink their actions if the
DOL English legislation significantly increased the fines. Consequently, severe punishment is frequently an effective and straightforward means of regulating the conduct of drivers on the road. Body 2: other approaches Idea 1: A => E Idea 2: A => E Example: A’ Link: A => E Body 2: there are still approaches => might successfully enhance road safety Idea 1: deploying surveillance cameras => significantly raise awareness of the importance of the necessity to adhere to speed restrictions Idea 2: there should be a greater emphasis on educating the public on the necessity of traffic rules Example: adolescents who are more inclined to disregard the laws => should be informed on how the severity of a traffic accident can be Link: these techniques => would also compel drivers to comply with traffic laws without resorting to only harsher fines. Nonetheless, I feel that there are still approaches that might successfully enhance road safety. First, if the federal and local authorities both cooperate in addressing this issue by deploying surveillance cameras, this could significantly raise awareness of the importance of the necessity to adhere to speed restrictions. Secondly, there should be a greater emphasis on educating the public on the necessity of traffic rules; in particular, adolescents who are more inclined to disregard the laws should be informed on how the severity of a traffic accident can be. Thus, these techniques would also compel drivers to comply with traffic laws without resorting to only harsher fines. In conclusion, although tougher fines may be a simple solution to combating driving violations, they are not the only feasible strategy, as installing security cameras and improving road safety education would also be highly impactful. (291 words) Vocabulary - Collocations: raising the punishments for traffic offenses = stricter penalties = Putting harsher punishments on irresponsible drivers = increased the fines = severe punishment # lenient penalties installing traffic cameras = deploying surveillance cameras = installing security cameras
DOL English investing in driving awareness = a greater emphasis on educating the public on the necessity of traffic rules = improving road safety education reduce the number of accidents occurring = minimize traffic accidents and promote safe driving = regulating the conduct of drivers on the road = successfully enhance road safety = compel drivers to comply with traffic laws = combating driving violations (291 words) SAMPLE 2 2. Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Main point 1: Idea: A => E Explain: A’ => ... => E’ Example: A’ => ... => E’ Effect: A => ... => E Hypothesis: Without A => E (-) Link/Conclude: A => E Idea: Enforcing additional fees on international tourists =>unwise and discriminatory approach Explanation: by making purchases of necessities => Foreigners already support the local economy Example: Vietnam and Thailand - millions of dollars brought in a year by visitors => is a significant contributor to their national GDP Effect: further charge foreign tourists to visit museums and other cultural attractions => it is not sensible Hypothesis: if the additional costs were applied regardless => they would feel resentful and may choose not to return to the nation. Link/Conclude: this practice => leads to a decline in international visitors Enforcing additional fees on international tourists is an unwise and discriminatory approach. Foreigners already support the local economy by making purchases of necessities like food,
DOL English lodging, and transport. In the case of developing nations like Vietnam and Thailand, for instance, millions of dollars brought in a year by visitors is a significant contributor to their national GDP. As a result, it is not sensible to further charge foreign tourists to visit museums and other cultural attractions. In fact, if the additional costs were applied regardless, they would feel resentful and may choose not to return to the nation. Consequently, this practice leads to a decline in international visitors, which is detrimental to a country's economy over the long term. Main point 2: Idea: A => E Explain: A’ => ... => E’ Effect: A’ => ... => E’ Link: A’ => ... => E’ Idea: attracting visitors for the sake of financial benefit => sharing one's nation's heritage with the world is far more important Explain: the higher costs => a collapse in tourist activities => decrease the exchange of one's history and tradition to the world at large Effect + Link: only wealthy vacationers could afford to visit that country => a nation's cultural impact dwindling, which in turn renders that country less developed Furthermore, sharing one's nation's heritage with the world is far more important than attracting visitors for the sake of financial benefit. The prospect of a collapse in tourist activities as a result of the higher costs would decrease the exchange of one's history and tradition to the world at large. This would mean that instead of millions of people entering a nation to learn about its culture and customs, only wealthy vacationers could afford to visit that country. This leads to a nation's cultural impact dwindling, which in turn renders that country less developed in terms of international relations and diplomacy. Full essay: It is frequently maintained that foreign visitors should pay more than natives for sightseeing significant sites and attractions. Due to the potential negative impacts on a country’s economic development and reputation, I strongly oppose this notion. Enforcing additional fees on international tourists is an unwise and discriminatory approach. Foreigners already support the local economy by making purchases of necessities like food, lodging, and transport. In the case of developing nations like Vietnam and Thailand, for instance, millions of dollars brought in a year by visitors is a significant contributor to their